Managed IT
Backup and Disaster Recovery Services That Get Tested
Almost every organization has backups. Far fewer can show that a restore works, that ransomware could not reach the stored copies, or that anyone knows the order to bring systems back. The difference only becomes visible on the worst day, which is too late to discover it.
The distinction
A backup job that succeeds is not a recovery capability
Backup software is good at reporting success. What it cannot tell you is whether the data it captured is usable, whether the systems it captured are the ones the business actually needs, or whether anyone in your organization knows the sequence required to get from a set of files to a functioning company. Those questions are answered by testing, and testing is the step that gets skipped.
The gap becomes concrete under ransomware. Operators no longer just encrypt and wait; they locate backup infrastructure first, because a client with recoverable backups does not pay. A backup appliance joined to the same domain, reachable with the same administrative credentials, is part of the environment being attacked rather than a defense against it.
There is a second gap that catches organizations later: recovery order. Restoring a file server is straightforward. Restoring a business is a sequence: identity first, then the systems that depend on it, then applications, then the connectivity and access that let people actually use them. Without a documented sequence, an outage that should last hours lasts days while people work it out under pressure.
So the work here is three things: design backups that survive an attacker, prove restores by performing them, and write down what recovery actually looks like before anyone needs it.
The problem
What this solves
The conditions that turn a recoverable incident into an extended outage.
Restores are never tested
Job reports are green, so nobody verifies. The first real restore attempt happens during the incident, when there is no time to solve surprises.
Backups live inside the blast radius
Stored copies sit on the same network, reachable with the same credentials, so a single compromise takes the systems and the recovery path together.
Coverage has gaps nobody noticed
A server added last year, a new cloud application, or a workstation holding the only copy of critical files was never included in the protected set.
Microsoft 365 is assumed to be covered
Organizations believe the platform backs up their mail and files, then discover the limits of retention after a deletion goes unnoticed for months.
No agreed recovery objectives
Nobody has stated how much data loss is acceptable or how long the business can be down, so the design cannot be judged against anything.
The plan lives in one person's head
Recovery depends on an individual who understands the sequence, which is a problem when the incident happens while they are unreachable.
Scope
What we cover
Scope depends on your systems and your agreed objectives. Not every element applies to every organization.
Recovery objective workshop
Working through each system to agree how much data loss is tolerable and how long the business can operate without it, then documenting both.
Backup design and deployment
Protection for servers, endpoints, virtual machines, and databases with multiple copies, offsite separation, and retention aligned to your obligations.
Immutable storage
Stored copies that cannot be altered or deleted within their retention window, so an attacker with administrative access still cannot destroy them.
Credential separation
Backup systems that do not authenticate against the environment they protect, so a domain compromise does not become a backup compromise.
Microsoft 365 backup
Customer-controlled protection for Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams data, covering deletion, compromise, and departure scenarios.
Scheduled restore testing
Restores actually performed on a defined cadence, with results documented, because a restore that has never been attempted is an assumption.
Recovery runbooks
Written procedures covering system dependency order, where restored workloads run, who authorizes decisions, and how people regain access.
Ransomware recovery planning
Planning for the scenario where production is encrypted: isolation, clean-environment rebuild, and the sequence for returning to operation.
Continuity documentation
The technical documentation that supports a broader business continuity plan and satisfies contingency-planning requirements in compliance frameworks.
Ongoing monitoring and reporting
Daily verification that protected systems are backing up, with failures investigated rather than left in a report nobody opens.
Our approach
How we build recovery capability
Each phase produces something checkable, and the last one repeats indefinitely.
- 01
Assess
Inventory what exists, what is protected, where copies are stored, and who or what could delete them. Establish the honest current state.
- 02
Define
Agree recovery point and recovery time objectives per system with your leadership, so the design targets business decisions rather than defaults.
- 03
Implement
Deploy backup coverage with immutability, offsite separation, and credential isolation, then document the recovery sequence in a runbook.
- 04
Test and maintain
Perform restores on a schedule, record the results, and revise coverage and runbooks as systems are added, changed, or retired.
Business outcomes
What you get out of it
The outcome of this work is measured in what happens on a bad day, so that is how we describe it.
Recovery becomes evidence, not belief
You have documented restore results rather than a report that says jobs completed, which is the difference between knowing and hoping.
Ransomware loses its leverage
Immutable, credential-separated copies mean an attacker who encrypts production has not taken away your ability to come back.
Outages get shorter
A documented recovery sequence removes the improvisation that turns an hours-long restoration into a multi-day one.
Cloud data is genuinely protected
Microsoft 365 mail and files are recoverable on your terms rather than within the limits of platform retention.
Insurers and auditors get answers
Cyber insurance applications and framework assessments ask specifically about backup immutability and restore testing. You will have both.
Leadership knows the exposure
Recovery objectives are agreed in advance, so the business has decided what it can tolerate instead of finding out during an incident.
Fit
Who this is for
- Organizations that have backups but no record of a tested restore
- Businesses whose operations stop entirely when a specific system is unavailable
- Companies that saw a peer or supplier suffer a ransomware event and want to know their own position
- Organizations completing cyber insurance applications that ask about immutability and restore testing
- Manufacturers and professional services firms where downtime has a direct and immediate revenue cost
- Regulated businesses whose framework requires documented contingency planning and recovery capability
When it may not be the right fit
We would rather tell you up front than sell you something that will not help.
- Organizations wanting backup software installed with no testing, documentation, or recovery planning
- Businesses unwilling to define recovery objectives, since the design has nothing to be measured against
- Environments where the backup path must remain reachable with the same credentials as production, which defeats the design
- Companies seeking a compliance checkbox rather than a capability that will be exercised
Your backups are a primary target
Treat backup infrastructure as one of the most sensitive systems you operate, because attackers do. Reaching it means immutability at the storage layer, credentials that are not shared with the production environment, multi-factor authentication on backup consoles, and monitoring of the backup system itself. A backup platform administered with the same domain account as everything else is protected only until that account is phished.
Backups also concentrate regulated data. A backup set typically contains everything your production systems contain, which means the same classification, encryption, retention, and access-control expectations apply to it. Organizations handling Controlled Unclassified Information sometimes secure production carefully and leave backup copies to an arrangement nobody reviewed. Our compliance practice covers where those obligations land.
One boundary worth stating plainly: recovery is not incident response. Restoring systems into an environment where the attacker still has access reinfects them. When an incident is active, containment and investigation come first, and our incident response service exists for exactly that sequence.
Backup and recovery questions
What organizations ask about recovery
We already have backups. What would change?
Usually the answer to one question: when was the last time someone restored from them. Backup software reporting a successful job is not evidence that the data is usable, that the right systems are included, or that anyone knows the sequence to bring the business back. We have found jobs running successfully against a server that was decommissioned, backups of a database that were unusable because the application was never quiescing writes, and complete backup sets sitting on a share the ransomware would have encrypted along with everything else. Testing is what converts a backup into a recovery capability.
What are RPO and RTO, and who decides them?
Recovery point objective is how much data you can afford to lose, measured in time: if backups run nightly, a failure at 4pm loses a day of work. Recovery time objective is how long the business can operate without the system. You decide both, per system, because they are business judgments rather than technical ones. Our role is to tell you honestly what each target costs to achieve and to design to the targets you choose, then write them down so expectations are explicit before an incident rather than contested during one.
Does Microsoft 365 need a separate backup?
It generally does, and this catches organizations out. Microsoft operates the platform reliably and provides retention and recycle-bin features, but those are limited in duration and are not a customer-controlled backup you can restore from after a deletion goes unnoticed, an account is compromised, or a departing employee cleans up their mailbox and files. Under the shared responsibility model, your data remains your responsibility. A separate backup of Exchange Online, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams data closes that gap.
How do backups survive a ransomware attack?
By being unreachable from the environment that gets encrypted. Modern ransomware operators specifically hunt for backup infrastructure and delete or encrypt it before triggering the payload, because destroyed backups are what forces payment. The countermeasures are immutability, so stored copies cannot be altered or deleted within their retention window; separation of credentials, so domain administrator access does not grant backup access; and an offsite copy outside the blast radius. A backup server joined to the same domain with the same credentials is one compromised account away from being worthless.
What is the difference between backup and disaster recovery?
Backup is a copy of data. Disaster recovery is the documented, tested ability to resume operating. That needs the copy plus somewhere to run, the order in which systems must come back, the network and access to reach them, and people who know the procedure. Organizations with excellent backups still suffer long outages because nobody had planned where a restored server would run or which system had to come up first. We plan for the recovery, not just the copy.
Does this cover the whole business, or only IT systems?
Our technical scope is systems and data. Full business continuity planning extends further (alternate premises, staff communication, manual workarounds, and customer notification) and works best when the technical recovery plan feeds into it. We produce the technical component and the documented recovery sequence, and we will happily participate in a broader continuity exercise with whoever owns it. If a compliance framework requires contingency planning, our compliance practice covers that documentation requirement.
Explore next
Related services
Incident Response
Containment and investigation, which must come before restoration if the attacker still has access.
Learn moreCloud & Microsoft 365
Tenant configuration and identity controls that reduce the likelihood of needing to recover in the first place.
Learn moreManufacturing
Recovery planning where production downtime has an immediate, measurable operational cost.
Learn moreFind out what would actually happen
A backup and recovery assessment answers three questions: what is protected, whether it restores, and how long you would be down. Most organizations learn something uncomfortable from at least one of them.
